Baroness Scotland of Asthal: My right honourable friend the Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Nationality (Liam Byrne) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	In January 2006 the Home Office (IND) requested that a pilot scheme be undertaken by the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) to evaluate the effects that increased reintegration assistance may have on incentivising failed asylum seekers, and those who wish to withdraw any outstanding asylum applications or appeals, to return to their country of origin. This Statement gives details of progress to date.
	Introducing a pilot programme to offer VARRP (Voluntary Assisted Return and Reintegration Programme) participants an additional £2,000 as either additional reintegration assistance or cash grants has increased the number of voluntary returns under this programme. There were 1,956 such returns between January and April 2006, which represents an increase of 108 per cent over the corresponding period in 2005.
	A significant amount of work continues to promote voluntary returns, and there is to be a high level of interest to take up the scheme. We have decided to extend the scheme for a further six months, during which time and IND and IOM will undertake additional analysis of the results of the pilot scheme to assist in developing the most appropriate level of incentive in future voluntary return programmes.
	Only those who applied for asylum before 1 January 2006 can benefit from the enhanced package of reintegration assistance, and they must leave the UK between 1 July and 31 December 2006 in order to qualify.

Baroness Ashton of Upholland: My right honourable friend the Minister of State (Harriet Harman) has made the following Statement in the other place today.
	My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Defence and I wish to make the following Statement to the House about inquests due to be held in the Oxfordshire area. All casualties suffered by the UK Armed Forces are a source of profound regret. UK service personnel have put their lives on the line to help the Iraqis build a strong, stable and democratic Iraq and we cannot pay high enough tribute to the job they are doing, or the sacrifice some of them have made. We are committed to assisting families of UK service personnel who have died in Iraq when their loved ones are returned to the UK.
	Today we are announcing information about the conduct of inquests by the Oxfordshire coroner, Mr Nicholas Gardiner, and how we intend to enable him to conduct expeditious inquests in his jurisdiction including into the deaths of servicemen and women who have died in Iraq.
	Background
	Inquests are to serve two main purposes: first, to account publicly, in the public interests, for the cause of death; and, secondly, to give an opportunity for the bereaved family to ask questions about the death.
	Each death of a service man or woman killed in an operation overseas whose body is repatriated to England and Wales is subject to an inquest. The inquest—both the investigation into the death and the holding of the public hearing into the death—is conducted by the coroner with jurisdiction which derives from where the body lies. In the case of deaths of service men and women whose bodies are flown into Brize Norton military airbase, the Oxfordshire coroner Mr Gardiner has jurisdiction.
	Over the past 12 months, in addition to the non-armed forces inquests for which he has jurisdiction, Mr Gardiner, his deputy coroners and one other coroner have conducted 30 inquests into the deaths of servicemen who have died in Iraq.
	There remain 59 inquests to be concluded into the deaths of service personnel killed in Iraq, and 11 inquests of civilians whose bodies were flown into Brize Norton.
	This does include the five deaths which occurred on 7 May in the helicopter crash in Basra and the two deaths which occurred on 13 May but not the two deaths from the 28 May bomb explosions near Basra.
	Further support for the coroner to conduct inquests on deceased armed forces personnel
	The Government have made available to the Oxfordshire coroner the resources to enable him to deal with the outstanding inquests:
	Assistant Deputy Coroner: Sir Richard Curtis, a retired High Court Judge will be available from the end of June (subject of course to a number of other commitments), for the coroner to appoint as necessary.
	Assistant Deputy Coroner: Selena Lynch will be available to begin on case papers from the week commencing 5 June, and is available from then until early July and then from late July onwards, for the coroner to appoint.
	Assistant Deputy Coroner: Andrew Walker who is available to begin on case papers next week and is then available for two weeks in August and then from mid-September onwards.
	Two additional coroner's officers: Thames Valley Police have confirmed that they have two officers available who can be in place by the end of next week.
	Additional member of support staff: This is available immediately.
	Recording equipment: to enable two further courts to operate simultaneously.
	Progress in the remaining inquests
	The Oxfordshire coroner expects, with the additional resources, which have not hitherto been at his disposal, to be able to conclude those inquests of service men and women where the Ministry of Defence has completed its own inquiries and case papers have been prepared by the end of the year (we know of 30 cases in this category). With the additional resources the coroner would also expect to conclude inquests of civilians killed in Iraq where he has been provided with reports and other information (we know of three cases in this category) by the end of this year. We intend to keep the House informed on a quarterly basis about progress through the remaining inquests. We attach a table, which outlines the number of inquests outstanding and the date of death in each case.
	Liaison with the next of kin
	It is of the greatest importance that the next of kin have full information about the progress on the inquest of their deceased next of kin. The extra coroner resources will enable this to happen, in addition to the normal liaison between the Ministry of Defence and the families concerned.
	Coronial Independence
	Coroners are independent judicial officers. They are appointed and paid for by the relevant local authority and their officers and staff are employed by the local authority and/or the police.
	
		Oxfordshire coroner: (i) Servicemen fatalities
		
			 Date of death Name of deceased 
			 21/03/03 Lance Bombardier Evans* 
			 21/03/03 Sergeant Hehir* 
			 21/03/03 Major Ward* (Royal Marines) 
			 21/03/03 Captain Guy* (Royal Marines) 
			 21/03/03 Warrant Officer 2 Stratford* (Royal Marines) 
			 21/03/03 Colour Sergeant Cecil* (Royal Marines) 
			 21/03/03 Marine Hedenskog* 
			 21/03/03 Operator Maintainer (Communications) 1 
			 Seymour* (Royal Navy) 
			 22/03/03 Lieutenant Wilson 
			 22/03/03 Lieutenant West 
			 22/03/03 Lieutenant Green 
			 22/03/03 Lieutenant Williams 
			 22/03/03 Lieutenant King 
			 22/03/03 Lieutenant Lawrence 
			 22/03/03 Flight Lieutenant Main* 
			 22/03/03 Flight Lieutenant Williams* 
			 22/03/03 Sapper Allsopp 
			 22/03/03 Staff Sergeant Cullingworth 
			 24/03/03 Sergeant Roberts* 
			 25/03/03 Corporal Allbutt 
			 28/03/03 Lance Corporal of Horse Hull 
			 30/03/03 Lance Corporal Brierley 
			 30/03/03 Marine Maddison 
			 30/03/03 Major Ballard 
			 01/04/03 Lance Corporal Shearer 
			 06/04/03 Fusilier Turrington 
			 06/04/03 Private Muzvuru* 
			 06/04/03 Lance Corporal Malone* 
			 13/08/03 Private Smith 
			 23/09/03 Sergeant Nightingale 
			 01/01/04 Sergeant Patterson 
			 01/01/04 Major Stenner 
			 02/01/04 Lance Corporal Craw 
			 28/06/04 Fusilier Gentle 
			 19/07/04 Flight Lieutenant Gover* 
			 09/08/04 Private O'Callaghan 
			 31/10/04 Staff Sergeant Rose* 
			 08/11/04 Private Tukutukuwaqa 
			 01/05/05 Guardsman Wakefield 
			 25/05/05 Lance Corporal Brackenbury* 
			 29/06/05 Signaller Didsbury 
			 15/07/05 Private Spicer 
			 15/07/05 Private Hewett 
			 15/07/05 2nd Lieutenant Shearer 
			 05/09/05 Fusilier Manning 
			 05/09/05 Fusilier Meade 
			 30/01/06 Lance Corporal Douglas* 
			 31/01/06 Corporal Pritchard* 
			 02/02/06 Trooper Smith* 
			 28/02/06 Private Ellis* 
			 28/02/06 Captain Holmes* 
			 28/02/06 Lieutenant Palmer* 
			 15/05/06 Private Morris* 
			 15/05/06 Private Lewaicei* 
			 07/05/06 Wing Commander John Coxen* 
			 07/05/06 Lieutenant Commander Darren Chapman* 
			 07/05/06 Captain David Dobson* 
			 07/05/06 Flight Lieutenant Sarah-Jayne Mulvihill* 
			 07/05/06 Marine Paul Collins* 
		
	
	Source: Oxfordshire Coroner and Ministry of Defence
	* denotes that the investigation is incomplete.
	
		Oxfordshire coroner: (ii) Civilian fatalities
		
			 Date of death Name of deceased 
			 22/03/03 Terry Lloyd* 
			 11/10/04 P Chadwick 
			 24/05/04 Robert Morgan 
			 24/05/04 Mark Carman 
			 09/12/04 Rag Gurung* 
			 24/05/04 John Dolman* 
			 01/01/05 Nicholas Pears* 
			 01/01/05 John Eardley* 
			 01/01/05 Tracy Hushin* 
			 30/07/05 Kenneth Hull* 
			 30/07/05 Andrew Holloway* 
		
	
	Source: Oxfordshire Coroner and Ministry of Defence
	* denotes that the investigation is incomplete.

Lord McKenzie of Luton: My right honourable friend the Chief Secretary to the Treasury (Mr Stephen Timms) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.
	National statistics published on 31 May show continued growth in the number of tax credit recipients:
	the total number of families benefiting rose to 5.9 million in 2004–05 (a 3.5 per cent increase compared to 2003–04);
	305,000 families benefited from the childcare element (a 14 per cent increase compared to 2003–04);
	79,000 families benefited from the disabled worker element (a 23 per cent increase compared to 2003–04); and
	end-year adjustments leading to an overpayment have fallen by a fifth—from £2.2 billion in 2003–04 to £1.8 billion in 2004–05.
	The statistics record levels of end-year adjustments. They were preceded by the Comptroller and Auditor General's standard report on the accounts of the Inland Revenue 2004–05; by HMRC officials' evidence to the Public Accounts Committee on 19 April; by the Paymaster-General's remarks in the House on 11 May 2006; and by correspondence dated 25 May 2006 between the Paymaster-General and the Chairmen of the Public Accounts and Treasury Select Committees, which all reported the view that end-year adjustments would be at a level similar to that in 2003–04.
	End-year adjustments are an integral part of a flexible system that responds to families' circumstances as they change. Payments are based on household incomes, which can of course change during the year. Payments are therefore subject to adjustment during the year and, if necessary, at the end of the year once these changes in incomes are known. National statistics show that end-year adjustments leading to an overpayment have fallen by a fifth—from £2.2 billion in 2003–04 to £1.8 billion in 2004–05. Improved performance of the tax credits system has meant that fewer overpayments are caused by IT or administrative error. This is demonstrated by the improvements made to accuracy in processing and calculating awards, which rose from 78.6 per cent in 2003–04 to 96.5 per cent in 2004–05.
	HMRC expects to recover the majority of the money overpaid, except where there has been a mistake by HMRC and it is not reasonable to expect the claimant to have noticed the error. Since the introduction of tax credits there have been clear procedures in place to ensure that recovery of overpayments does not create hardship. These include reduced recovery rates for those on low incomes, and, for those who are no longer receiving an award, 12-month instalment plans are available with longer repayment periods where necessary. On top of this HMRC considers the case for making additional payments to those who claim hardship as a result of recovery.
	The national statistics released on 31 May relate to a previous year, 2004–05, and so do not show the impact of measures announced at the time of the 2005 Pre-Budget Report to give greater certainty to families while maintaining flexibility to respond to changing circumstances. Once these come fully into effect the level of end-year adjustments is expected to fall by a further third in future years.
	The tax credits system has delivered three key achievements: it has improved incentives to work, reduced the tax burden on low to middle-income families and helped to dramatically reduce child poverty.
	Tax credits play a major role in moving people into work and helping people move up the employment ladder, ensuring that work pays over welfare. Tax credits and economic stability have helped to increase the number of people in work by over 2 million since spring 1997, and since 1997 long-term unemployment has reduced by 450,000. From October 2006:
	a couple with two children, moving into full-time work on the national minimum wage will be £41 per week better off compared with the £34 per week gain to work in 1997;
	a lone parent with two children, moving into full-time work on the national minimum wage will be £76 per week better off compared with the £54 per week gain to work in 1997; and
	a single person without children, moving into full-time work on the national minimum wage will be £58 per week better off compared with the £39 per week gain to work in 1997.
	Tax credits have also been central to reducing the tax burden on low to middle-income families. The latest OECD study shows a large fall in the tax burden for families as a result of tax credits. The tax burden on a single-earner couple with two children earning £21,000 has fallen from 17.3 per cent of gross earnings in 1997 to 9.8 per cent in 2004. This is the lowest rate of any G7 country.
	In the UK, a single-earner family with two children can now earn just under two-thirds of the average wage before they start to pay any net tax—ie, pay more in tax than they receive in financial support from the Government. Tax credits have helped to ensure that the number of families with children paying no net tax has risen from under 2.5 million in 1997–98 to over 3 million in 2006–07.
	The tax credit system has also played a key role in tackling child poverty. Since 1996–97, 700,000 children have been lifted out of relative poverty, compared to a doubling of child poverty in the previous 20 years. Tax credits have also helped to halve the number of children in absolute poverty. There are now over 1.8 million fewer children in absolute low income compared to 1996–97 on a before housing costs basis.
	Tax credits today provide support to 20 million people including 6 million families and 10.1 million children. Take-up of tax credits is substantially higher than in any previous system of income-related financial support for in-work families, with low-income families most likely to take up their entitlement. In the first year of tax credits 93 per cent of families on incomes below £10,000 claimed their entitlement to child tax credit. This compares to 50 per cent in the early years of family income supplement, 57 per cent for family credit and 62-65 per cent for working families tax credit.
	Building on the experience of the first two years of the new tax credits system, the Government have introduced a series of administrative enhancements and policy developments to improve the operation of the tax credits system.
	A detailed programme of administrative improvements was announced in the Paymaster-General's statement to the House on 26 May 2005. This included measures to improve HMRC's communication with families about their tax credit awards, reduce the risk of errors adding to overpayments, and improve the procedures for recovering overpayments.
	Specific measures have also been taken to improve the service received by tax credit customers. From April 2006, award notices have included a clearer summary of what will be paid and, for the first time, an explanation of how this has been calculated. The guidance notes sent to customers with their award notices have been improved, making it easier for recipients to check whether information is correct. HMRC's code of practice on overpayments has been revised on the reasonable belief test when deciding whether to write off an overpayment.
	As set out in the Paymaster-General's statement to the House on 5 December, analysis of the available data on end-year adjustments, or overpayments, suggests that they are caused by a number of factors. As a result, the Government announced the following key policy changes:
	First, to address the impact of the annual income rises that have led to the need for adjustment, the Government announced an increase in the tax credits disregard from £2,500 to £25,000.
	Secondly, families sometimes overestimate the extent to which their income has fallen when they seek extra support during the year. To address this, when claimants report a fall in income during the year, their tax credits payments will be adjusted for the rest of the year to reflect their new income level, but will not include a one-off payment for the earlier part of the year. At the end of the year, their award will be finalised when their actual income is known. If they have been underpaid, a further payment will be made in the ordinary way.
	Thirdly, HMRC will continue to make provisional payments at the start of the tax year based on information from the previous year until claimants submit renewal information. But to reduce the scale of subsequent updating, the renewal window will be reduced to five months.
	Fourthly, there are sometimes delays in reporting changes in families' personal circumstances to HMRC. The Government therefore announced greater responsibilities on claimants to report changes of circumstances, to ensure that delays in reporting do not lead to the need for subsequent adjustments. In addition, the notification period will be shortened.
	Fifthly, to reduce the impact of adjustments on family circumstances, automatic limits on the amount by which tax credit payments can be reduced to recover a tax credit overpayment will be introduced.
	These policy changes are designed to minimise the need for adjustments while maintaining the flexibility to respond to reductions in income and changes in circumstances.
	Eliminating the need for adjustments would require a move to a fixed system where eligibility was based on the previous year's income and circumstances, and where, as a result, flexibility would be diminished. This flexibility to respond to changing circumstances is important in today's modern labour market where in any year 3 million people change jobs. Each year at least 200,000 men and women who move into new or better jobs see their family income rise by more than £10,000.